Dec
11
2018

Tweet of the Day, @GroovyBruce Answers The Call edition.

Honestly, isn’t this the best answer?

Seriously; somebody gimme a reason why Bruce Campbell SHOULDN’T host the Oscars.  And they shouldn’t interfere with his artistic vision, either.  It’d be entertaining, right?  You’d think that they’d like to put on something entertaining.

And don’t underestimate the ‘finish on time’ part, either.  That’s a promise with teeth in it.  God knows that the Academy needs to install some order all up in that show, and right quick…

8 Comments

  • Rockphed says:

    I would actually be tempted to watch the Oscars if I knew Bruce Campbell were going to host.

    • acat says:

      Mrs. Cat used to watch ’em every year .. she more or less quit a couple years back.
      .
      Bruce hosting would be .. tempting ..
      .
      Mew

  • nicklevi86 says:

    Yes, Bruce Campbell is awesome. But Hollywood keeps telling me, in no uncertain terms, that they DO NOT want any of my dirty filthy money.
    .
    I see no reason to disagree with them on this point.

    • Luke says:

      This.
      .
      As much as I’m a Bruce Campbell fan, my interest in the Academy awards is well into the negative territory.
      .
      I’d check out his bits on YouTube later, with all the twaddle edited out.

  • Belcatar says:

    Only if he is allowed to host the Oscars in character, which would allow him to address the audience with the sentence, “All right, you primitive screwheads, listen up!”

RSS feed for comments on this post.



Site by Neil Stevens | Theme by TheBuckmaker.com