Twitter seems to think that this site is now dangerous.
11 thoughts on “Hey, has anybody had any problems with bad ads?”
Nothing amiss on my end but then I consider all ads ‘bad’.
Slow load times occasionally on mobile devices, but nothing more than that.
OK here.
No issues here and this is one of the few sites that makes the whitelist for my adblocker.
Given Twitter’s “Trust and Safety” algorithms*, some of your past…. activities probably triggered someone/thing.
.
.
.
*I initially miss-typed that as “malgorithm.” On reflection, it seems more than accurate.
I’ve had sketchy ads served before on this site while I was on my phone, back before I added the ad-blocker to it. That was a few months ago, however.
No problems for me.
Guess you’re not on Anita Sarkeesian’s buddy list. Which means you’re on their Star Chamber’s shitlist.
One would hope that that’s not true, considering how petty it would be at this stage.
I personally think Twitter is dangerous.
I wonder if it’s a https thing? If you try https://moelane.com it won’t serve the site.
Nothing amiss on my end but then I consider all ads ‘bad’.
Slow load times occasionally on mobile devices, but nothing more than that.
OK here.
No issues here and this is one of the few sites that makes the whitelist for my adblocker.
Given Twitter’s “Trust and Safety” algorithms*, some of your past…. activities probably triggered someone/thing.
.
.
.
*I initially miss-typed that as “malgorithm.” On reflection, it seems more than accurate.
I’ve had sketchy ads served before on this site while I was on my phone, back before I added the ad-blocker to it. That was a few months ago, however.
No problems for me.
Guess you’re not on Anita Sarkeesian’s buddy list. Which means you’re on their Star Chamber’s shitlist.
One would hope that that’s not true, considering how petty it would be at this stage.
I personally think Twitter is dangerous.
I wonder if it’s a https thing? If you try https://moelane.com it won’t serve the site.