I think that I’ve mentioned this before, but it’s evergreen: the ideological opposite of a progressive is not a conservative. It’s a libertarian. Conservatives often appear to be ideological opposites to progressives, but that’s largely because we think that you need to convince us first before we’ll sign off to letting the State do something. And until you can convince us, the answer is going to default to ‘no.’ But once you convince us of something, the answer obviously becomes ‘yes’ and there’s nothing really further to discuss, is there?
This, by the way, drives progressives quite mad. You see, because they have an ideology progressives obviously stake out policy positions based off of that ideology. Whether or not said those ideologically-consistent positions actually make any rational sense. It bugs them exceedingly when we insist on treating each new policy position on a case-by-case basis (which is one good reason to keep doing it)…