On the ‘margin of fraud.’

These two sentences from Dan McLaughlin’s article on close elections are the most important, I think:

For whatever reason, when statewide races are decided by less than 1 point, Democrats win almost three-quarters of the time.

And

When the margin opens to 1-2 points, that advantage dissipates, and the Democrats win only half the races…

Continue reading On the ‘margin of fraud.’

The Morning After Wisconsin.

Well.  It’s barely Prosser, and we’re off to the recount.  You’re going to see the phrase  ‘margin of fraud’ a lot this morning; while this is a valid concern, the bright side to that is that with a Republican governor AND Republican legislature – neither of which is particularly inclined to be trusting – Wisconsin Democrats will find it harder to play the same games that their compatriots may-or-may-not-have-played in either Washington State or Minnesota.  Seriously, having Republicans in charge of the oversight hearings will be a big help in keeping down shenanigans; we had neither in the Rossi / Coleman affairs, and in my opinion it had an effect.

Even brighter side?  Maybe Secretary of State Doug La Follette* will muck up things enough to justify a recall election.  Retiring that particular well-meaning political dynasty from the American political scene would frankly be a mitzvah.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

Continue reading The Morning After Wisconsin.