ISIS gearing up for an actual War On Women, and pretty much everyone else.

It’s the usual that you can expect from Islamist fanatics: no freedom of religion, assembly, no public graves, no alcohol or drugs, no women allowed outside unless absolutely necessary – and wearing restrictive, depersonalizing clothing when they do – and, of course, nothing resembling a secular state.  The liberal American Left would absolutely hate living in those portions of Iraq and Syria that ISIS ends up controlling, not least because the second they got caught they’d be taken somewhere and then beheaded for the benefit of Islamist murder porn websites.  Because that’s what happens.

Am I angry?  Yes. In 2009 we handed over what was at least a functional situation to the Democrats, and as long as the Democrats continued to do precisely the same things (well, as well as they could) as we did things seemed… stable enough.  But apparently that wasn’t enough.  And now we’re going to have a load of pain in the Middle East until the grown-ups start running the American government again.

Joy.

Moe Lane

PS: Oh, we’ll get through it.  But like T.H. White’s King Arthur, I assign a value to Middle Easterner’s life and limbs: the value assigned by the Middle Easterners themselves.  They aren’t cardboard cutouts that move, ten years of antiwar agitprop to the contrary.

PPS: Sure, great, have the Iranians come on in. Does no one in this administration know how to read?

AP: Barack Obama not yet ruling out military intervention in Iraq.

I’m trying hard to not say anything that might discourage the President from doing what is probably the least-bad option* here.

President Barack Obama said Thursday Iraq will need more help from the United States as it seeks to push back a violent Islamic insurgency that has captured two key cities and is vowing to press toward Bagdad.

Obama did not specify what type of assistance the U.S. would be willing to provide, but said he had not ruled out any options.

I’m trying really, really hard. Continue reading AP: Barack Obama not yet ruling out military intervention in Iraq.

People shocked to discover that Iraq picked up democracy via usual osmosis process.

I must be honest: I am shaking my head at the sense of wonder found in this essay on Iraqi electoral progress.

By far the most important thing about the preliminary results of Iraq’s April 30 parliamentary election is the nature of the conversation that is now taking place about them. It is a conversation about what it means for a sitting Prime Minister when he wins less than 30 percent of the vote but does much better than his rivals—and about whether Iraq’s next government should be one of broad national unity or formed on the basis of a simple majority. It is a conversation about deliciously esoteric and endlessly iterative matters of parliamentary arithmetic in a place where no identity group is close to monolithic and where almost any of the ten main factions is capable of working with any other. Continue reading People shocked to discover that Iraq picked up democracy via usual osmosis process.

Tweet of the Day, …I Forget, Sometimes, That Not Everybody Is As Numb edition.

I mean, I knew this, right?

 

Continue reading Tweet of the Day, …I Forget, Sometimes, That Not Everybody Is As Numb edition.

#rsrh Two different prayers against Syria using WMDs.

For the record, it can be broken down as follows:

  • The Right; the Middle; the rank-and-file, Ordinary, Decent members of the Left*: “Please, God: do not let the Assad regime use chemical and biological weapons against dissidents and rebels.  So many innocent lives will be lost if that happens.”
  • The Leadership of the Democratic party; the antiwar movement: “Please, [insert metaphysical entity of choice here]: do not let the Assad regime use chemical and biological weapons that were originally from Iraq** against dissidents and rebels.  We will lose the 2012 elections if that happens.”

What?  Oh, if you’re in the second group then I certainly hope you’re offended.  Offending people who only are in favor of liberating foreigners when it rebounds to the credit of the Democratic party is one of my benchmarks for proper moral development.

Continue reading #rsrh Two different prayers against Syria using WMDs.

#rsrh QotD, Walter Russell Mead’s Laudable Naivete edition.

(Via Instapundit) It’s kind of nice, that Mead can still believe that such a thing could happen:

President Obama and Vice President Biden must be deeply grateful that President Bush ignored his critics and went ahead with the surge; if they want to reduce the partisan polarization in Washington they could perhaps say something about it as our troops come home.

Completely impossible, of course: far too many progressives have based their moral center around a reflexive and habitual opposition to the liberation of Iraq and Afghanistan for the President to dare risk telling them the truth.  For that matter, said opposition will make it equally impossible for the President to “make a peace,” as Mead’s article proposes.  The antiwar Left has never thought of Iraqis as being really people, you understand; and now that Iraq can no longer be used to target Republicans there’s simply no reason for progressives to care about what happens in that country.  The best that Iraqis can hope for at this stage is benign neglect.

Moe Lane

PS: I feel forced to note that Mead seems to think that the Bush administration ‘botched’ the administration.  I also feel forced to reply: ‘botched’ as compared to what?  I hate to break it to modern America, but the Iraq War wasn’t our bloodiest.  It wasn’t even our bloodiest occupation, frankly.  Pride: it really is an insidious sin…

#rsrh Keywords Iraq, withdrawal, 2012, early warning, repercussions …

…hasty response, abandonment, Sunni – Shi’ite conflict, Republicans cleaning up Democratic messes, Clintonian, short-sighted, parallels to 1990s, abandonment, Cassandra, flawed counter-terrorism policy, Iran, People’s Republic of China, Russia, Uzbekistan, resurgence of Chinese expansionism, resurgence of Russian expansionism, Kurds, Third Gulf War, Fourth Gulf War, Israel, Middle East Conflict, origins of the current crisis, Hi folks: sorry that we messed up things for you a decade or two down the line – but in my personal defense I voted for the other guy in 2008.

Link.

Obama to reduce Iraq strength to 3,000, lose election…

…and set up the bank shot in 2016 for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, apparently:

The Obama administration has decided to drop the number of U.S. troops in Iraq at the end of the year down to 3,000, marking a major downgrade in force strength, multiple sources familiar with the inner workings and decisions on U.S. troop movements in Iraq told Fox News.

[snip]

This shift is seen by various people as a cost-saving measure and a political measure. The only administration official fighting for at least 10,000 forces to stay in Iraq at the end of the year was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, sources said. But she has lost the battle.

No, I don’t actually think that this scenario is actually what’s unfolding: nobody in the administration’s brave enough to try it.  But, speaking cynically, this would work as a long term strategy.  Accept that the election’s lost, set up a disaster for the Republican President to inherit and take the blame for, and put the one brave truth-teller in position to come over in 2016 and save the day.  It’s not optimal, but then it’s going to take a couple of years for the Democrats to fix everything that Obama’s done to their party.  They might as well sabotage things for the GOP in the meantime.
Continue reading Obama to reduce Iraq strength to 3,000, lose election…

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell *had* 32 teeth.

“Lawrence, we can end this interview right now if you don’t want me to finish my point.”

I know this, because I just watched him crawl on the floor trying to retrieve them after he tried to push around former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

This one’s going around. Newsbusters, @adambaldwin, the Daily Caller – take your pick. Particularly enjoyable was the part where she called O’Donnell a liar:
Continue reading MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell *had* 32 teeth.

#rsrh Quick observation about hanging Saddam.

Turns out that you can hang a bloodthirsty, genocidal dictator and not create a martyr and/or long term problems for yourself.  Go figure.

That’s it: I was just meaning to bring that up eventually, and I figure that four years is a reasonable amount of time to wait before doing so.  Also: read that link.  Pre-Surge Iraq coverage by the regular media never ceases to amaze with its passive-aggressive schadenfreude.