Why the SotU seating buddy system…

…was, overall, not an advantage for the President: it made things dull.

Well. Duller. You kind of need that seating polarization to give you the feedback at how well or poorly the President is doing at the SotU. Mind you, the seating buddy thing also did something really, really cruel to President Obama: it denied him an opportunity to look over the crowd and think to himself Damn, but we got our heads handed to us last year.  That’s something that he really, really needs to remember for the next two years, lest he end up watching the 2014 SotU address from a private residence in Chicago.

Hey, if I thought that he was actually listening to me I’d never be writing this out.  It’s not like the President has me over every Sunday for cakes and tea…

Moe Lane

Winning the future.

…is of course the title of this book byNewt Gingrich: Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America.  Which is a book that I have never read, and probably will not read – I’m not that big into political books, mostly because I already produce enough amateur punditry to not really need outside sources – but if the President is so determined to make Winning the Future a Google search term I might as well cash in on it.

Remember: filthy lucre, folks.  Filthy. Lucre.

Moe Lane

Hey, quick request.

If you’re a webcomic artist who is not drawing a politically-themed webcomic, do your readers a favor and not drop politically-based entries at random, and without warning.  Particularly if you think that you can be extra-rude because there’s not a chance that one of them will be reading you.  It jars.  It certainly makes it abruptly more likely that you’ll never get a link again.

Yes, xkcd gets away with it.  You are not xkcd.

Thanks in advance!

Moe Lane

PS: I’ve pretty much dropped the few political-themed webcomics I was reading, mostly because I’m trying to find a place where I can stop thinking about that sort of thing for a while.

#rsrh Hi! I’m Loretta Sanchez! I’m a vulture!

This is me!

I want to throw Gabby Giffords off of the House Armed Services Committee until she’s recovered from her assassination attempt!  I thought that it was important because without that vote we’d have NINE more Republicans on the committee than Democrats, not eight!

(pause)

I can count up to nine!

(pause)

I was almost carried away by members of my own party and beaten with sticks!

(pause)

I memorialized my cat, Gretzky!

Moe Lane

#rsrh Blah blah, blah blah blah…

…blah blah:

(pause)

Sorry: it’s just that I’ve just heard that tonight’s SotU is going to be a heck of a lot like last year’s SotU, and the only things of any kind of interest that happened at last year’s SotU were the two reactions to two damfool things that the President said.  Couple that with the fact that Enzio is STILL stuck in that stupid tomb in Assassin’s Creed 2, and the end result is that I am bored, bored, bored.

Filibuster ‘reform’ near?

Scare quotes, because it’s DC Kabuki Time!  For those who are not ‘blessed’ enough to live within the Beltway – or downwind of it – this is that special time in the legislative calendar where federal politicians preserve the status quo by changing nothing at all and putting a big, red bow on the result.  In this particular case, the scenario is as follows: for some strange reason, certain progressives want to make it easier for Republicans to repeal Obamacare by making the threshold for a cloture vote less than the current 60.  Saner Democrats – which is to say, about a third to a half of the Senate Democratic caucus – don’t want this to happen, mostly because they can count, and they’re well aware of the minor detail that 2012 is shaping up nicely as a Senatorial bloodbath for their party.  So, it’s time for a compromise!

This is what they came up with:

Under the emerging deal, senators would still be able to put a “hold” on nominations and legislation — and therefore prevent quick votes on them — but instead of remaining anonymous for several days as current rules allow, the name of a senator who employs a hold would be made public right away. Supporters of this reform believe that senators will be less likely to drag out a dispute if they need to defend it publicly.

When asked about this, Senator Tom Coburn – who is easily the Senator most likely to call for a hold, and who takes an innocent, care-free glee in maintaining that status – responded by showing Senate progressives the Hawaiian good-luck symbol, and then going off to deliver another baby, in flagrant violation of Senate work ethics laws*.

So I think that you can safely assume that this is not actually going to be, well, relevant.  I won’t even go into the other two supposed provisions – reducing the number of nominees requiring confirmation, and banning reading the bills aloud – mostly because there’s no real confirmation that either ‘reform’ will be even adopted.  Even if they are, the odds that anything would have changed was… low.  Which could be seen as a pity: Democratic Senators worried about their reelection prospects stampede nicely.

Ach, well.

Moe Lane (crosspost) Continue reading Filibuster ‘reform’ near?

‘Costumes: the Wearable Dialog.’

That’s the title of this post by Dresden Codak webcomic author Aaron Diaz, and it’s… very readable, actually.  I’m not a graphic artist, but Diaz’s analysis of costume design, its goals, and its pitfalls was easy to follow along, and made a good deal of sense to even a non-initiate.  Quite worth looking at.

Now, if only he could manage to draw a darn comic more than once a month…