PS: Yes, I know. You’re tired of it. You’re tired of hearing about it. Alas, this is the single most important piece of domestic political news going on today, and I am a junkie. It’ll be all over tomorrow.
WE ARE THEN TREATED TO LENGTHY SCENES OF JUGHEAD AND POCAHONTAS FLYING AROUND TOGETHER ON THE MOST AWESOME FLYING PET THAT YOU COULD NEVER GET ON EARTH BECAUSE EARTH SUCKS AND NEVER LETS HUMANS HAVE AWESOME ANIMALS THAT BASICALLY EXIST TO BE OUR PERSONAL EXTREME SPORTS EQUIPMENT. STUPID EARTH AND IT’S STUPID EVOLUTION.
Does it count as ‘spoilers’ when the description is likely to be better than the actual piece of art? If this was accurate, I would have been screaming “With this level of biotech, why did the military even let him stay crippled in the first place?!?” about five minutes into the film.
Moe Lane
PS: Whether Kipling would be proud is another story. I suspect that the author of The Supplication of Kerr Cross may have had a more nuanced opinion than many would expect.
…having now been more or less forced to watch Wallace and Gromit: A Close Shave five times running in the last 48 hours, I can say with some authority that Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics are a damn good idea.
This sentence from the latest PPP Brown/Coakley poll jumped out at me:
Overall 25% of voters in the state think ACORN will mess with the Senate election while 38% don’t and 37% are unsure.
Tom Jensen’s been making a good-faith (and I think, largely successful) effort to keep his own political bias out of his firm’s polling, so I don’t blame him for not pointing out that this means that almost 2/3rds of the population of Massachusetts is willing to believe that ACORN could be planning election fraud. In Massachusetts.
Specifically, my thanks to him for writing this article, which starts with an alleged 2008 conversation that he had with two ‘Republican’ financial experts:
…one offered a dire and uncannily accurate forecast. He explained why banks would blow up, investments would crash and the federal government would have to spend “at least $300 billion” to bail out financial institutions.
The other financial expert listened closely, took a sip from his drink, and smiled. “This,” he said, “would seem like an excellent time for the Democrats to take power.”
I agree: it was an excellent time. After all, it’s their fault that we’re in this mess in the first place. Remember Burning Down the House? – because it’s an excellent time to revisit it, too. It’s a bit long; but think of it as a tutorial for helping you learn to deprogram some of your mugged-by-reality colleagues and friends.
It didn’t resonate in the 2008 election cycle… but, hey: it’s 2010 now. You better off now than you were in 2006?
Moe Lane
PS: Dionne’s valiant attempt to pretend that nothing negative about the current economy – nothing at all – should be laid at the feet of the current ruling party has been both duly noted and mocked.
…then you know we have a lot of digging to do, but some work needs to be done and this president’s in the process of doing it and we need to get Marcia Coakley to help him to do that.”
(Curiously, [Rep Patrick] Kennedy [D, RI] mentioned Coakley repeatedly during his remarks to reporters, each time referring to her as “Marcia,” not “Martha.”)
‘Curiously?’ I can think of at least three reasons why it wouldn’t be, and one of them doesn’t even imply a substance abuse problem on Kennedy’s part.